• District 13   (2404 pts)
  • District 20   (1515 pts)
  • District 03   (1082 pts)
  • District 19   (946 pts)
  • District 02   (894 pts)
Sign Me
User Name
Password
Forgot Password?
Click Here to connect with your facebook account
 
 
Let's Get Connected Here!
HDB Prices Set to Tumble from 2010?
Last Post 09 Mar 2010 01:21 AM by rihannah. 97 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 5 of 5 << < 12345
Author Messages
hennyUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:1942


--
06 Mar 2010 01:46 PM  
Posted By flipper on 05 Mar 2010 06:09 PM
personally I don't think the prices would drop a lot. And hope that it doesn't drop a lot. else, my money would go down the drain.

In singapore, most residents are asset-rich, cash poor (or moderate..haha), so if prices drop a lot, the net worth of each individual would tumble.

I share your sentiments, Flipper.
I am very concerned of the latest sudden measures by the govt that are directed at lowering the prices of existing HDB flats.
 
Each and every existing HDB flat owner would be affected very badly.
 
Why the sudden "concern" by HDB and the fast & speedy action when for years since prices started rising, nothing was done?
frontosaUser is Offline
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
Posts:372


--
06 Mar 2010 01:52 PM  
This one we have to turned to Newton's 3rd law

Action and reaction forces.
hennyUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:1942


--
06 Mar 2010 01:53 PM  
Posted By DarthRevan on 05 Mar 2010 07:56 PM
Posted By flipper on 05 Mar 2010 06:09 PM
personally I don't think the prices would drop a lot. And hope that it doesn't drop a lot. else, my money would go down the drain.

In singapore, most residents are asset-rich, cash poor (or moderate..haha), so if prices drop a lot, the net worth of each individual would tumble.

Actually the prices tumble or not don't matter if the home owner don't sell. Unless they're speculators, then it's a different story. Most pple buy HDB flats to stay, at least majority of the population, not for investment.

DarthRaven,

 
Please do not forget that your flat is bought with your CPF money, which is essentially your pension fund or retirement money.
 
Most people have $0 left in their CPF ordinary account upon retirement after taking a hefty 30 year housing loan from HDB.
 
If prices do tumble and your flat is worth little, it is as good as loosing your CPF retirement fund.
 
Even worse than losing money in the Lehman Brothers collapse whereby you are still compensated for your losses.
 
How are you going to live your retirement years without money, or do you intend to work till death?

 
frontosaUser is Offline
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
Posts:372


--
06 Mar 2010 02:17 PM  
In the first place, the flat you buy is already very ex. I wonder how much left in the cpf when one reach 50. Will it come to a point of time that a 99 year loeasehold flat will require 2-3 generation to pay?
hennyUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:1942


--
06 Mar 2010 11:36 PM  
I don't even dare think of retirement.

In my mind every day, every minute and second, I am thinking of $$$, how to make more $$$ to finish paying the loan before the 30 yr period, and any unexpected expenses for my children.

Nowadays schools have many compulsary payable activities outside of school circulum. Example: Outward Bound School camp expense $400+. Faint! And its compulsary!
 
I have to continue having bread and oats for lunch again for the next few months.
gimz63251073User is Offline
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
Posts:157


--
07 Mar 2010 01:00 AM  
all in all, it comes back to the same question: are you over-stretching your self financially for the roof over your head?

if you need to take 30 years to repay off your loan, then its extremely not prudent. If prices tumble, you are screwed. If prices keep on going up, you may be able to retire, but ur next generation would be super screwed.

either way, no ideal outcome. The most and best outcome is for prices to increase very slowly over time, just enough to cover inflation to preserve the asset value.

DarthRevanUser is Offline
I'm a baby Shroomy!
I'm a baby Shroomy!
Posts:70


--
07 Mar 2010 01:53 AM  
Posted By henny on 06 Mar 2010 01:53 PM
DarthRaven,

 
Please do not forget that your flat is bought with your CPF money, which is essentially your pension fund or retirement money.
 
Most people have $0 left in their CPF ordinary account upon retirement after taking a hefty 30 year housing loan from HDB.
 
If prices do tumble and your flat is worth little, it is as good as loosing your CPF retirement fund.
 
Even worse than losing money in the Lehman Brothers collapse whereby you are still compensated for your losses.
 
How are you going to live your retirement years without money, or do you intend to work till death?

 

I do see where you are coming from.

If a person have $0 left in his/her CPF after 30 years, that only means that he/she is overcommitting. eg. buying a bigger flat than he should.

If price tumbles, it's only a "paper loss". The loss/profit is not realised if the flat is not sold.

After paying for my flat using cpf from me & wife, there's still a portion left for both of us. Over time, it will become a substantial amount if we continue working. There's still insurance/unit trusts/share dividends/savings to supplement our retirement funds. Of course all these are just plans, and we have to carry it through.
ThinkUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:1627


--
07 Mar 2010 07:15 AM  
Housing policy changes not enough for some PRs to take up citizenship
By Joanne Chan, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 06 March 2010 1911 hrs
 

SINGAPORE : The government has sharpened the differentiation in housing benefits enjoyed by citizens and permanent residents (PRs), but some PRs have said it is still not enough for them to take up citizenship.

And as revealed in Parliament on Friday, households comprising one citizen and one PR will now have to pay more to buy an HDB flat.

A new quota for non-Malaysian PRs has also been implemented to prevent enclaves from forming in estates.

28-year-old Vina Mubtadi has been a PR for the last 1.5 years.

She recently married a Singaporean, and the couple hopes to buy a flat soon and start a family.

With rising housing prices already a concern, the latest changes in housing policy will make it even more expensive for them to own a home.

Still, Ms Vina said she is not quite ready to give up her Indonesian citizenship, despite the carrot being dangled by the Singapore government.

She said: "If I give up my nationality, that means I cannot have a property in Indonesia. But if I stay a PR (in Singapore), although I have to pay a higher price to own a property here, at least I can have a property here and I can also have a property in Indonesia."

Previously, a household comprising one Singapore citizen and one PR would have enjoyed the same level of housing subsidies as a Singaporean couple.

With the changes, Singaporeans married to PRs will receive S$10,000 less in housing grants if they buy a resale flat. Alternatively, they will have to pay a S$10,000 premium if they buy a new HDB flat. However, the amount will be restored if the PR family member becomes a citizen, or if the couple has a child who is Singaporean.

National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan had also announced a new quota for non-Malaysian PRs in housing estates. He noted that this would help to encourage integration.

Market watchers said this may affect Singaporean homeowners more than the PRs.

David Poh, senior group district director, PropNex, explained: "If a certain estate has reached its maximum PR quota, then Singaporeans can only choose to sell to Singaporeans. So they cannot be so choosy about it, because if a PR wants to buy their house, they cannot sell it to them. So they probably cannot ask for too high a price.

"Whereas if you are a PR living in an estate with a full PR quota, then you can choose to sell to both Singaporeans and PRs. In this case, you probably can ask for a slightly higher price."

The quota is set at five per cent at the neighbourhood level, and eight per cent at the block level. This is in addition to the Ethnic Integration Policy already in place.

HDB said that 13 out of the 162 neighbourhoods islandwide are likely to be affected by the new quota for PRs. - CNA/ms

hennyUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:1942


--
07 Mar 2010 10:34 AM  
 
David Poh, senior group district director, PropNex, explained: "If a certain estate has reached its maximum PR quota, then Singaporeans can only choose to sell to Singaporeans. So they cannot be so choosy about it, because if a PR wants to buy their house, they cannot sell it to them. So they probably cannot ask for too high a price.

"Whereas if you are a PR living in an estate with a full PR quota, then you can choose to sell to both Singaporeans and PRs. In this case, you probably can ask for a slightly higher price."

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
Why is the Government coming up with a new policy favouring PRs (Permanent Residents) and putting Singaporeans at a disadvantage?
 
I am puzzled !!!
 
It's like your own government back stabbing you!
FDUser is Offline
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
Posts:383


--
07 Mar 2010 12:57 PM  
From the way i read it, it is just another excuse for some unprofessional property agents trying to make their job easier.

It's like: "Mr. Lee, your block PR quotas full, not much choice u have so better accept this sg couple offer now". But hey thats a agent problem, your agent are suppose to source the best deal in the best interests for the party they represent. Therefore, make your agent work hard for their money not the other way.
At the end of the day, you have to decide whats the best offer around and not being too greedy to ask for more than what you suppose have.

In fact, things have became harder for PR's after all these measures and i doubt few singaporeans would complain about it.

flipperUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:1891


--
08 Mar 2010 12:25 PM  
Posted By DarthRevan on 07 Mar 2010 01:53 AM
Posted By henny on 06 Mar 2010 01:53 PM
DarthRaven,

 
Please do not forget that your flat is bought with your CPF money, which is essentially your pension fund or retirement money.
 
Most people have $0 left in their CPF ordinary account upon retirement after taking a hefty 30 year housing loan from HDB.
 
If prices do tumble and your flat is worth little, it is as good as loosing your CPF retirement fund.
 
Even worse than losing money in the Lehman Brothers collapse whereby you are still compensated for your losses.
 
How are you going to live your retirement years without money, or do you intend to work till death?

 

I do see where you are coming from.

If a person have $0 left in his/her CPF after 30 years, that only means that he/she is overcommitting. eg. buying a bigger flat than he should.

If price tumbles, it's only a "paper loss". The loss/profit is not realised if the flat is not sold.

After paying for my flat using cpf from me & wife, there's still a portion left for both of us. Over time, it will become a substantial amount if we continue working. There's still insurance/unit trusts/share dividends/savings to supplement our retirement funds. Of course all these are just plans, and we have to carry it through.


Hi Darth,
 
good for you, but lots of people in Singapore are not like that. 
 
Hmm, "paper loss" is also loss.  E.g. the stocks that you buy, the gold that you buy, or even the 10 million Toto ticket that you buy. 
 
Although I buy my flat to stay not for invest, I would like to see the price of it goes up, or at least maintain. Actually maintain is not so good.  Factor in 3% inflation, actually it depreciates.  Anything that depreciates is a liability already, like a car.
 
Hmm, I'm not an economist, so this is my layman point of view :D 
 
rosylooksUser is Offline
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
I'm a teenage Shroomy!
Posts:621


--
08 Mar 2010 01:59 PM  
Paper loss (or gain) - as the term implies, it is nothing concrete and depends when you are assessing your property.
As long as you are not cashing out, it will not affect you, thus, don't stress (or toast) yourself over it.
Importantly, make sure it is 'home sweet home'.
DarthRevanUser is Offline
I'm a baby Shroomy!
I'm a baby Shroomy!
Posts:70


--
08 Mar 2010 06:19 PM  
I don't agree with letting PRs buy HDB flats easily, some of them might be buying to rent it out or to sell for profit after a short period..and then to return to their homeland. This will only serve to jack up the prices for our fellow countrymen.
gimz63251073User is Offline
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
I'm a toddler Shroomy!
Posts:157


--
08 Mar 2010 06:36 PM  
With the sale and leaseback option, the price of flats would serve an important role as it determines your retirement fund.

i can foresee many taking up that option simply becos they would have NIL in their CPF for retirement. To really crush the bubble, they can set an upper limit as to the amount of withdrawal you can make from your CPF account to pay for the mortgage. That will really send prices tumbling down. But of cos, they will not do something so drastic.

PRs buy flats because of high rental rates. The rental keeps on rising until they are frustrated and decide to just plunge in to buy the flat, knowing well that prices would hold reasonably well. To them, buying makes more sense than renting. Restrict them from buying would mean more people buying HDB to rent out as rental rates keep rising.

HDB would never be able to crack down on illegal subletting as there are simply too many flats to go around. They need to employ tons of people to check, to chase after the owners, to listen to their appeals and sob story and then decide whether to fine then or to take back their flats...etc. This would eat up too much of their resources and at the end of the day, HDB will only be playing the bad guy and all they end up with is a poor financial performance. So who in the right mind in HDB would go all out to enforce? I am sure the answer is clear.
surfuzUser is Offline
I'm an experienced adult Shroomy!
I'm an experienced adult Shroomy!
Posts:4019


--
08 Mar 2010 06:48 PM  
Posted By rosylooks on 08 Mar 2010 01:59 PM
Paper loss (or gain) - as the term implies, it is nothing concrete and depends when you are assessing your property.
As long as you are not cashing out, it will not affect you, thus, don't stress (or toast) yourself over it.
Importantly, make sure it is 'home sweet home'.

Agree with you on this. Think it doesn't really matter.. except perhaps for folks who are vested in multiple properties.
 
Retirement.. I feel that if I find cost of living high now, it will surely be higher and worst by the time I retire. Will be in worst shape then as it's likely that earnings will decrease. So if better avoid touching CPF $.. plan and save / invest more for retirement right now.. :P
 
Btw, if clamp down on illegal subletting is not enforced...  wont that be penalizing the rest of of the law abiding HDB owners?
rihannahUser is Offline
I'm a baby Shroomy!
I'm a baby Shroomy!
Posts:98


--
08 Mar 2010 07:54 PM  
Posted By henny on 07 Mar 2010 10:34 AM
 
David Poh, senior group district director, PropNex, explained: "If a certain estate has reached its maximum PR quota, then Singaporeans can only choose to sell to Singaporeans. So they cannot be so choosy about it, because if a PR wants to buy their house, they cannot sell it to them. So they probably cannot ask for too high a price.

"Whereas if you are a PR living in an estate with a full PR quota, then you can choose to sell to both Singaporeans and PRs. In this case, you probably can ask for a slightly higher price."

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
Why is the Government coming up with a new policy favouring PRs (Permanent Residents) and putting Singaporeans at a disadvantage?
 
I am puzzled !!!
 
It's like your own government back stabbing you!
This David Poh guy doesn't seem to be entirely accurate.
 
If a certain estate has reached its max PR quota, a Singaporean may only sell to fellow Singaporeans and may not fetch a price as high as before.  True, but it also benefits the Singaporean buying as the price of the resale flat will be lower, which is also what the govt wants, isn't it?
 
If you are a PR living with a full PR quota, you may sell it to both Singaporeans and PR.  True, but it works both ways - if you are a Singaporean living with a full Singaporean quota, you can also sell to both Singaporeans and PRs.  It simply depends on your luck and which quota the estate has maxed out.
 
Correct me if  I'm wrong on this.
Happy MushroomUser is Offline
I'm a baby Shroomy!
I'm a baby Shroomy!
Posts:36


--
08 Mar 2010 11:49 PM  
I guess this is to curb the resale market. sigh...
rihannahUser is Offline
I'm a baby Shroomy!
I'm a baby Shroomy!
Posts:98


--
09 Mar 2010 01:21 AM  
From http://lushhomemedia.com/2010/03/07/property-agents-call-for-curbs-on-subletting/,

Property agents call for curbs on subletting


The slew of new measures announced by the Government last Friday to curb speculative buying and selling of Housing Board flats does not address one issue – subletting – said property experts.

Under current rules, buyers of resale HDB flats can sublet the entire flat after three years if they did not take a government grant or HDB loan.

If they bought the flat with the grant and HDB loan, the minimum stay-in period is five years.

‘If you want to stop prices from rising and people from speculating, control the rental market too,’ said Mr Raymond Quah, president of Dennis Wee Properties.

The rental market indirectly influences the price of resale flats, said agents.

Home owners, realising that they can make money from rentals, are unlikely to sell their flats should they go on to buy private property.

This may lead to a dip in the supply of resale flats in the market, resulting in resale flat prices going up, said Mr Steven Tan, executive director of OrangeTee’s residential division.

There are also other factors that influence resale flat prices. One is the reselling of flats as soon as the minimum occupation period is up – one year for those who bought a resale flat without government subsidies or loans.

That is why the Government unveiled new rules last Friday to curb speculative buying and selling of public housing.

Among these new rules is one that states that the minimum occupation period for resale flats with and without subsidy is now three years.

The current rules on subletting were laid down in 2007 – after earlier rule changes in 2005 and 2003 – to allow more people to earn cash from leasing out their property.

Before 2003, owners were not allowed to rent out their flats unless they were working abroad, for example.

That year, HDB relaxed the rule to allow home owners to rent out their flats after 10 years if they had paid up the loan, and 15 years if they had not. In 2005, this was cut to five and 10 years respectively.

‘But the circumstances are different now – prices have spiked – and it is time to go back to the old rules,’ said Mr Quah.

There had been spikes in HDB resale prices in the three months following every rental rule change, suggesting there may be a connection between resale prices and subletting.

For instance, in the second quarter of 2003 following the February 2003 HDB rental rule change, resale prices went up by 2.13 per cent from first-quarter prices, according to HDB’s resale price index. This compared with only a 0.2 per cent increase in the same period a year ago.

More recently, after further easing of subletting rules in March 2007, the three months that followed saw resale prices jump 2.95 per cent. This compares with a 0.98 per cent increase during the same period in 2006.

Ms Jarina Shamsudeen, an agent with property firm PropNex, also felt the Government should revert to the old subletting rules to control property prices.

Based on anecdotal evidence, more Singaporeans approaching 35 years old are buying and subletting their flats for income. ‘Permanent residents are doing that too,’ she said.

Ms Jarina suggested that only Singaporeans posted overseas should be allowed to sublet their flats, and that private home owners should also be barred from subletting.

According to OrangeTee’s Mr Tan, tweaking subletting rules is necessary because ‘no matter how small the contributing factors are, they do add up’.

He was responding to a comment from National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan that only 3 per cent – or 20,460 flats – of eligible homes are sublet.

Mr Mah suggested that most flat owners are buying their flats for occupation and not rental.

‘If private property owners can buy HDB flats or keep their existing flat to earn money from rentals, the supply of resale HDB flats will dip,’ Mr Tan said. This will push up the prices of resale flats.

Illegal subletting may have indirectly contributed to rising HDB prices, said Knight Frank consultant Peter Ow.

It is known that some people lock up a room in the flat but lease out the entire unit, exploiting a loophole in the law.

‘This is not an issue of policy but policing,’ Mr Ow said.

Unless rules are enforced rigorously, having them will not deter people from doing things behind the backs of the authorities.

‘Even if there are rules to control subletting, people will still break them. So the rules – tighter or not – would not have much of an impact,’ said an ERA agent who did not want to be named.

But not all home owners who rent out their flats are speculators.

Retiree Christine Chan, 65, rents out two rooms in her five-room flat in Choa Chu Kang as this is her only source of income.

‘I cannot find employment anymore due to my age, so I rely on the $1,000 I make from renting out two rooms for retirement,’ she said.

‘I am not looking to make a quick buck. I feel that if the Government were to tighten the rules, it should make some exceptions.’

Source : Sunday Times – 7 Mar 2010
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 5 of 5 << < 12345


Active Forums 4.1

FAQ | Disclaimer | Do's and Don'ts | Copyright | I want to go Home
Page generated in 0.13 seconds.